PropertyLensBengaluru · invest
← Project pageFull investment reportChoose “Save as PDF” in the print dialog.
PropertyLensBengaluru · invest
Financial & legal due diligence · public record · 18 Oct 2026

Cityville Valmark

Valmark · Bannerghatta Road / JP Nagar / Arekere · survey no 2,3,5,6,7,8,9,24 part of cs pura and 112 and 113 of kamanahalli , begur hobli , bannerghatta road.

Promoter entityVALMARK DEVELOPERS PVT LTD
Entity type · PANCompany · AACCV4484G
Developer brandValmark · #102 in Bengaluru by RERA registrations
RERA registrationsRegistration: PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/171222/000914
Planning authorityBBMP - Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike
Sanctioned plannot filed
Escrow bankHDFC, RICHMOND ROAD
Land27.82 acres
Court cases declared0
Complaints at K-RERA3 on this project · 3 on the promoter
Record fetchedSep 2026
2 red flags2 to watch2 positive

Automated from the Karnataka RERA file PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/171222/000914. Prices and rents are locality estimates, not verified listings. This report records what the Karnataka RERA file, the promoter’s quarterly filings, the complaint register, public credit ratings and company filings say. It states facts and flags them; it does not judge the investment. Prices, returns and the investment score live in the separate full report.

Financial & legal due diligence

What the public record says

Automated from the Karnataka RERA file PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/171222/000914. Prices and rents are locality estimates, not verified listings. Compiled Sep 2026 from the Karnataka RERA file, company registers, rating agencies, tribunal records and press. Facts only; anything that deserves a written answer before signing is flagged.

2 red2 watch2 positive
Delivery timeline5/10
1 extension on the registration (−2); a registration completion date has already passed (−2)
Legal & complaints7.5/10
3 RERA complaints on the project (−1.5)
Money to finish8/10
finance cost is 0% of the registered budget
Developer strength5/10
no public credit rating for the promoter

Meters are rule-based from the RERA file and public ratings (rules shown under each), not opinions.

Registration
PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/171222/000914 · VALMARK DEVELOPERS PVT LTD
Past RERA date
RegisteredMar 2016Original completionDec 2021Covid ext.Sep 2022TodaySep 2026
Construction20%
registration-time status
Collected (at registration)₹54.00 Cr
Spent₹1480.00 Cr
Balance with promoter₹0
Delay declaredNo
No litigation declared3 complaints · 0 openEscrow: HDFC
Credit ratings of the people behind it

No public credit rating located for the promoter.

VALMARK DEVELOPERS PVT LTD: no public rating located

Complaints & disputes on record
On this project30 open
On the promoter entity3all projects
Court cases declared0no stay recorded
What complainants raise
  • Delivery date expired
  • Refund with Compensation due to Inordinate Delay
  • Deceived by builder
At a glance
Registration extended 1×

Registration extended 1× — from 2021-12-31 to 2022-09-30 (already passed)

20% built

20% built per the latest filing

3 RERA complaints, 0 open

3 RERA complaints on this project (0 open); 3 on the promoter overall

No litigation declared

No litigation declared in RERA filings

The record, in pictures

RERA file · Registration

Registered project cost ₹580 cr — where it goes
Land ₹40 cr · 7%Construction & on-site ₹540 cr · 93%
No litigation declaredBorrowing declared: not statedEscrow at HDFC

Complaint log (K-RERA) · 3 on this project

  • Aug 2023Delivery date expireddisposed
  • Feb 2022Refund with Compensation due to Inordinate Delaydisposed
  • Sep 2020Deceived by builderdisposed
Complaints by status
Disposed (Authority)
3

Red flags to resolve in writing

1
Timeline

RERA completion date 2022-09-30 has passed without a completion application.

Questions to put to the developer before you sign

  1. Share the latest CA Form 4 and architect Form 5 with the escrow deposit ratio.
  2. Confirm the price list, floor-rise and other charges for the exact unit.
  3. Which date is contractual — 2022-09-30 — and what is the per-month delay compensation?
  4. Confirm there is no litigation on the land or approvals beyond the RERA declaration.
  5. Is the land freehold with the developer, and is any part mortgaged?
Full record: every filed number, line by line2 sections · 12 items

RERA file · Registration

Registration
PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/171222/000914 · promoter VALMARK DEVELOPERS PVT LTD (Company) · Proposed Project End Date at the time of registration :
Dates
Start 2016-03-23 · original completion 2021-12-31 · 1 extension: Covid Extension → 2022-09-30 · current date has passed
Progress
20% complete per registration-time status
Registered cost
Total ₹580 cr · land ₹40.00 cr · construction ₹540 cr
RERA bank account
HDFC, RICHMOND ROAD (70% construction account)
Money at registration
collected ₹54.00 cr · used ₹1480 cr · balance ₹0.00 cr · delay declared: No
Land & towers
27.82 acres (1,12,602 sq m) · Block 3 4 homes, 4 floors; Block 5 24 homes, 4 floors; Block 6 36 homes, 4 floors; Block 8 24 homes, 4 floors; Block 9 36 homes, 4 floors; Block 13 64 homes, 4 floors; Block 14 24 homes, 4 floors; BLOCK 17 (CLUB HOUSE) 4 homes, 3 floors; Block 7 50 homes, 4 floors; Block 10 38 homes, 4 floors; Block 11 16 homes, 4 floors; Block 2 58 homes, 4 floors; Block 12 20 homes, 4 floors; Block 4 12 homes, 4 floors; Block 1 38 homes, 4 floors; Block 15 76 homes, 4 floors; Block 16 24 homes, 4 floors
Litigation declared
None declared in filings
K-RERA complaints
3 on this registration (0 open) · 3 on the promoter entity across all its projects

Source: Karnataka RERA project record PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/171222/000914, fetched 2026-09-15. Figures are the promoter’s own filings.

Complaint log (K-RERA) · 3 on this project

2023-08-03 · 01210/2023
Delivery date expired — DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 (AUTHORITY)
2022-02-07 · CMP/220207/0008969
Refund with Compensation due to Inordinate Delay — DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 (AUTHORITY)
2020-09-10 · CMP/200910/0006543
Deceived by builder — DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 (AUTHORITY)

Complaint subjects are as filed by complainants; a disposed complaint may have been decided either way.

Sources & caveats2 sources
  • Karnataka RERA project record PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/171222/000914 (registration file, quarterly updates, complaint register), fetched 2026-09-15
  • PropertyLens locality model (market-level estimates)
  • Karnataka RERA project records PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/171222/000914 (registration file, quarterly updates, complaint register), fetched Sep 2026.

Caveats. Automated analysis: prices, rents and travel times are estimates until listings and Maps data are verified. RERA figures are the promoter’s own filings. Nothing here is legal, tax or investment advice.

PropertyLens · property-lens.ai · Facts are transcribed from public records as filed by the promoter and the regulator; figures on RERA certificates are promoter numbers certified on unaudited books. Absence of a court case or insolvency filing in these sources is not proof that none exists. Verify title, approvals and encumbrances with a lawyer before you sign. Nothing here is legal, tax or investment advice.
Share on WhatsApp