Godrej Properties vs Casagrand
62 Bengaluru projects from Karnataka RERA filings, as of September 11, 2026.
Casagrand has the better delivery record; Casagrand's projects score higher on investment merit
From Karnataka RERA filings: Godrej Properties 55% of registrations needed no extension with 12 of 34 under-construction projects past their original date and 65 promoter complaints; Casagrand 67% of registrations needed no extension with 8 of 20 past date and 161 complaints. Median project score: Godrej Properties 52, Casagrand 58. Judge the specific project, not just the brand.
Side by side
| Measure | Godrej Properties | Casagrand |
|---|---|---|
| Projects analysed | 40 | 22 |
| On-time rate (no extension filed) | 55% | 67% |
| Under construction past original RERA date | 12 of 34 | 8 of 20 |
| Average months overdue (late projects) | 27 | 41 |
| Extensions filed | 21 | 9 |
| Promoter complaints at K-RERA | 65 | 161 |
| Red flags across projects | 29 | 21 |
| Projects with litigation declared | 1 | 0 |
| Median investment score | 52 | 58 |
| Best project score | 81 | 83 |
| Median projected growth / yr | 10.5% | 9.6% |
| Median cash-flow IRR | 9.1% | 7.1% |
| Median gross yield | 3.2% | 3.2% |
| Median price per sq ft | ₹9,200 | ₹10,350 |
| Ready · under construction | 6 · 34 | 2 · 20 |
| Localities active in | 13 | 10 |
Green marks the better value on each line. Karnataka RERA filings and K-RERA complaint register as of September 11, 2026.
Best-scored Godrej Properties projects
Best-scored Casagrand projects
Questions people ask
Godrej Properties or Casagrand: which is the more reliable builder?
From Karnataka RERA filings: Godrej Properties 55% of registrations needed no extension with 12 of 34 under-construction projects past their original date and 65 promoter complaints; Casagrand 67% of registrations needed no extension with 8 of 20 past date and 161 complaints. Median project score: Godrej Properties 52, Casagrand 58. Judge the specific project, not just the brand.
Scores and projections are model outputs built from dated public evidence (Karnataka RERA filings, promoter quarterly updates, complaint registers, public ratings) and stated assumptions. They are research, not investment advice. How the numbers are built.