PropertyLensBengaluru · invest
Developer scorecard · #107 in Bengaluru by RERA registrations

Is Living Structures a reliable builder?

5 Bengaluru projects analysed from Karnataka RERA filings, quarterly updates and the K-RERA complaint register, as of September 11, 2026.

Straight answer · as of September 11, 2026

Living Structures in one paragraph

Living Structures has a mixed delivery record in Karnataka RERA filings: 72% of registrations needed no extension (4 of 5 crawled Bengaluru registrations needed no extension). 2 of 4 under-construction projects are past their original RERA completion date, by 20 months on average (worst 20). The promoter entity carries 1 complaints at K-RERA across its projects. The median Living Structures project scores 36/100 on investment merit (well below the Bengaluru average); the best, Mark One, scores 46.

Delivery is judged on extensions filed, not on handover dates, because RERA records extensions reliably and handovers late. Extensions are common across Bengaluru; compare the rate with other developers below.

Projects analysed
5
1 ready · 4 under construction
On-time rate
72%
registrations with no extension filed
Past RERA date
2 / 4
avg 20 months over
Extensions filed
1
1 projects
Promoter complaints
1
K-RERA, across projects
Red flags
6
across due-diligence reports
Median score
36
best 46
Median growth / yr
10.0%
5-yr projection
Median price / sq ft
₹4,700
mid segment
Litigation declared
0
4 JDA · 1 NBFC-funded

Projects past their original RERA date

ProjectMonths overdueExtensionsBuilt · bookedComplaintsScore
42 Marquis
Attibele / Anekal / Chandapura
200100% of schedule · —132
42 Mark Three
Attibele / Anekal / Chandapura
200100% of schedule · —024

Overdue is measured against the completion date in the original registration. Many are covered by extensions, which RERA grants for up to a year at a time.

Best-scored Living Structures projects

All 5 analysed Living Structures projects

ProjectScoreGrowth / yrNet-wealth CAGRCash-flow IRRPrice / sq ftPriceStatus
Mark One
Living Structures · Attibele / Anekal / Chandapura
4610.3%6.0%8.6%₹2,750 est.₹33.0 LReady
Ls Sakura
Living Structures · Attibele / Anekal / Chandapura
4610.0%4.8%9.0%₹4,700 est.₹53.6 LUnder construction
Dec 2030
Ls Mark IX
Living Structures · Attibele / Anekal / Chandapura
3610.0%4.5%7.8%₹4,700 est.₹64.4 LUnder construction
Dec 2029
42 Marquis
Living Structures · Attibele / Anekal / Chandapura
3210.7%6.5%9.3%₹2,600 est.₹31.2 LUnder construction
Dec 2024
42 Mark Three
Living Structures · Attibele / Anekal / Chandapura
249.2%2.5%3.1%₹4,700 est.₹1.29 CrUnder construction
Dec 2024

Where Living Structures builds

Living Structures compared with other developers

Questions people ask

Is Living Structures a reliable builder?

Karnataka RERA filings as of September 11, 2026: 72% of registrations needed no extension; 2 of 4 under-construction projects are past their original completion date by 20 months on average; 1 extensions filed across 1 projects; 1 complaints on the promoter entity at K-RERA; 0 projects declare litigation. That is the public record; PropertyLens does not rate builders on opinion.

Which Living Structures project is the best investment?

Mark One in Attibele / Anekal / Chandapura scores highest at 46/100 with projected growth 10.3% a year and cash-flow IRR 8.6%. The median Living Structures project scores 36.

Is Living Structures delaying possession?

2 under-construction Living Structures projects are past their original RERA completion date: 42 Marquis (20 months), 42 Mark Three (20 months). Extensions filed with RERA are listed on each project page.

Where does Living Structures build in Bengaluru?

Attibele / Anekal / Chandapura (5). Median price ₹4,700 per sq ft across analysed projects.

Scores and projections are model outputs built from dated public evidence (Karnataka RERA filings, promoter quarterly updates, complaint registers, public ratings) and stated assumptions. They are research, not investment advice. How the numbers are built.

Share on WhatsApp