PropertyLensBengaluru · invest

Puravankara vs Bhavisha Properties

54 Bengaluru projects from Karnataka RERA filings, as of September 11, 2026.

Straight answer · as of September 11, 2026

Bhavisha Properties has the better delivery record; Puravankara's projects score higher on investment merit

From Karnataka RERA filings: Puravankara 70% of registrations needed no extension with 16 of 33 under-construction projects past their original date and 110 promoter complaints; Bhavisha Properties 94% of registrations needed no extension with 10 of 12 past date and 3 complaints. Median project score: Puravankara 52, Bhavisha Properties 44. Judge the specific project, not just the brand.

Side by side

MeasurePuravankaraBhavisha Properties
Projects analysed3717
On-time rate (no extension filed)70%94%
Under construction past original RERA date16 of 3310 of 12
Average months overdue (late projects)4631
Extensions filed170
Promoter complaints at K-RERA1103
Red flags across projects3920
Projects with litigation declared00
Median investment score5244
Best project score8156
Median projected growth / yr9.7%9.3%
Median cash-flow IRR7.0%7.2%
Median gross yield3.0%3.9%
Median price per sq ft₹9,500₹8,450
Ready · under construction4 · 335 · 12
Localities active in112

Green marks the better value on each line. Karnataka RERA filings and K-RERA complaint register as of September 11, 2026.

Best-scored Puravankara projects

Best-scored Bhavisha Properties projects

Questions people ask

Puravankara or Bhavisha Properties: which is the more reliable builder?

From Karnataka RERA filings: Puravankara 70% of registrations needed no extension with 16 of 33 under-construction projects past their original date and 110 promoter complaints; Bhavisha Properties 94% of registrations needed no extension with 10 of 12 past date and 3 complaints. Median project score: Puravankara 52, Bhavisha Properties 44. Judge the specific project, not just the brand.

Scores and projections are model outputs built from dated public evidence (Karnataka RERA filings, promoter quarterly updates, complaint registers, public ratings) and stated assumptions. They are research, not investment advice. How the numbers are built.

Share on WhatsApp